[squeak-dev] Re: Trunk image size
siguctua at gmail.com
Fri Dec 11 09:06:11 UTC 2009
2009/12/11 Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>:
> On 12/11/09 4:19 AM, "Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Can you send a full stack dump?
> It's only a example, not a real crash.
> My point is this.
> The update number is not only a commodity.
> If we have ...
>> Image: Squeak3.10.2 [latest update: #7179]
> Its unclear the point in the process the image is
> But if we got
>> Image: Squeak3.10.2 [latest update: #7234]
>> Image: Squeak3.10.2 [latest update: #7374]
> e could fine tune which could be
>>> If you let me , could put all in the ftp squeak
>> I do not understand what you mean.
>> - Andreas
> I have all the.cs and all the .logs.
> Very sure this could be of interes to some Squeaker.
> I have access to my own directories in fpt squeak, could put there or in
> another convenient place.
Logs is useful , and .cs also, for those who wants to cherry-pick some
of the changes
adopted in trunk.
So, +1 here.
> Last point of argue
> When finish 3.10.2 ? What have us chained to such number?
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Squeak-dev