[squeak-dev] Re: Updated trunk image (Squeak3.11-8472-alpha.zip)
Edgar J. De Cleene
edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar
Sun Dec 13 08:54:25 UTC 2009
On 12/13/09 5:43 AM, "Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> I most definitely want you to work on Squeak! But I'm not sure what
> you're waiting for ... so I'm confused. Did I miss something? I used the
> 3.11 denominator specifically because you asked for it, we got the image
> version numbering specifically because you asked for it so I don't feel
> like I'm not listening to you. If I missed something please let me know.
> - Andreas
Yes , you take the number and the version, it's true.
Also is true without you we still don't advance.
My complaint is .
I think backward compatibility have pros and cons.
But should be evident to any a image without Closures run some things and
one without NO.
I sure many still feel .cs have some mileage to work before we declare they
Repeat my point.
> So, we should
> Use old beloved sftp://email@example.com/home/updates/
> Put here some .cs for start the Trunk process
> I send some a few days ago.
> I beg you review, approve or change to your will
> Put the .cs in the folder
> When process try to load Closures, this should be the end of 3.10.2 and the
> start of 3.11
> Here should be
And we should have in some place all the .cs and all the logs.
Also we should run all the test, eventually.
By the way, like my image?
I volunteer to do this each time (monthly maybe ?) and start to add packages
which behave nicely, to Squeaker request.
Image should going smaller and modular, we agree on this
I also have
And use in this image Pavel start and I help all the SqueakLightII
I have videos of experimental loading Etoys.
It's valuable to community we some day have a consensual "Core", "Minimal",
Also each newbie should have a image as big as we could build without too
This Fun do not have glue, only "sudor y amor"
More information about the Squeak-dev