[squeak-dev] Re: Stuff

Juan Vuletich juan at jvuletich.org
Wed Dec 16 12:36:32 UTC 2009

Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Andreas wrote:
>> Pharo-core is not an option as a basis for Squeak since it is driven by 
>> a fundamentally incompatible set of ideas at this point.
> Can you elaborate on this a little bit more.
> At least there is enough interest shown here to keep all forks closer
> and I think Matthew wrote in November he will try to rebase Cobalt 
> atop Pharo. 
> Maybe Pharo-core is not "core" enough to be the basis for Squeak 
> and other distributions like Cuis, EToys, ... 
> So what is the "basis"?

We need to decide if this common core will include an UI framework or 
not. If the answer is 'yes' then it would be very much like Cuis itself.

> Since I use and enjoy both, Squeak and Pharo I think the main 
> question remaining is if we can find a common "core"/"kernel" for 
> all distributions/forks and how does it look like...
> Bye
> T.

Please take a close look at Cuis: http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html .

Juan Vuletich

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list