[squeak-dev] Re: Stuff
Juan Vuletich
juan at jvuletich.org
Wed Dec 16 12:36:32 UTC 2009
Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Andreas wrote:
>
>> Pharo-core is not an option as a basis for Squeak since it is driven by
>> a fundamentally incompatible set of ideas at this point.
>>
>
> Can you elaborate on this a little bit more.
>
> At least there is enough interest shown here to keep all forks closer
> and I think Matthew wrote in November he will try to rebase Cobalt
> atop Pharo.
>
> Maybe Pharo-core is not "core" enough to be the basis for Squeak
> and other distributions like Cuis, EToys, ...
> So what is the "basis"?
>
We need to decide if this common core will include an UI framework or
not. If the answer is 'yes' then it would be very much like Cuis itself.
> Since I use and enjoy both, Squeak and Pharo I think the main
> question remaining is if we can find a common "core"/"kernel" for
> all distributions/forks and how does it look like...
>
> Bye
> T.
Please take a close look at Cuis: http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html .
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|