On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org> wrote:

> Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>
>>
>> At least there is enough interest shown here to keep all forks closer
>> and I think Matthew wrote in November he will try to rebase Cobalt atop
>> Pharo.
>> Maybe Pharo-core is not "core" enough to be the basis for Squeak and other
>> distributions like Cuis, EToys, ... So what is the "basis"?
>>
>>
>
> We need to decide if this common core will include an UI framework or not.
> If the answer is 'yes' then it would be very much like Cuis itself.
>
> Please take a close look at Cuis: http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html.


I'll second this...if you haven't looked at Cuis, it is definitely worth the
look.  Of all the squeak distributions out there, this is probably my
favorite.  It's small, fast, and gets back to the basics of Smalltalk.  I
think it would be a good reference point on which to base other
distributions.

- Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20091216/1d88e28e/attachment.htm