On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:

> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>>    That's correct. Small meta note: I don't like playing "20 questions"
>>    very much. If you have a theory or want to verify something it's
>>    better to post your theory and have people comment on it. Posting
>>    one question to get a yes/no, then posting another one to get a
>>    yes/no tires me very quickly :-) See also the always appropriate
>>    essay from Eric Raymond:
>>
>>    http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html<http://www.catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
>>    <http://www.catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
>>
>>
>>
>> Well....You don't HAVE to answer me. This is a public space :)
>>
>
> Sure. And I'll ignore you as a repeat offender in the future :-)


ok...


> But it was a good opportunity to drop in a link to ESR's essay  and
> hopefully some people will click on it and ask better questions as a result.
>
>
Yes, it seems a good link. I started to reading it but it is too long so I
keep it so that I can read it when I have more time.


> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
>  In addition, I didn't have a theory. I just realized that after the
>> following emails. If I would had a theory I would wrote it completely.
>> Anyway, thanks for the help it helped me to understood.
>>  Kind regards,
>>
>> Mariano
>>
>>    Cheers,
>>     - Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20091223/22884680/attachment.htm