Colin Putney wrote:
> On 2009-12-23, at 8:05 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> 
>> Folks -
>>
>> I need some help with the PackageInfo-Base submission in the inbox. I'm simply uncertain if it is the correct implementation; it seems there is a potential issue there as the test makes an override to the package the method is defined in. This just smells funny and changing the way overrides get dealt with sounds a recipe for disaster if it goes wrong.
>>
>> Anyone up for checking the submission and giving it a thumbs up or down?
> 
> Thumbs down, I say. It appears to reverse the meaning of overridden; ie, it causes #overriddenMethodsDo: to answer the methods it overrides in other packages, rather than the methods it contains which have been overridden by other packages.

Thanks. But ... how exactly is one supposed to know that?

Cheers,
   - Andreas