[squeak-dev] Cosmetic: move or remove a few temps inside closures

Josh Gargus josh at schwa.ca
Mon Dec 28 19:46:44 UTC 2009

On Dec 27, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the high level of noise...
> I profited by the low traffic to apply Eliot mechanised tool (
> http://www.mirandabanda.org/cogblog/2008/11/14/mechanised-modifications-and-miscellaneous-measurements
> )
> + own manual changes to remove as much writes as possible (in a short
> time frame) to remote (external scope) temporaries from within a
> closure.
> This should fast up a little bit the image (probably not that much
> until Cog is available).
> We shall now take the habit of declaring temps in inner scope possible
> and avoid writing in outer temps if possible.
> By now, the cosmetic changes has at least a virtue of serving as examples...
> This is not purely cosmetic.  Block-local temps are more efficient than method-level temps assigned inside blocks.  The latter are indirect temps and cost more to access and cause blocks that use them to cost more to create.

Playing devil's advocate, this is surely something that the compiler could optimize away.

(not actually advocating, just sayin')


> Cheers
> Nicolas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20091228/969d964b/attachment.htm

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list