[squeak-dev] UTF8 methods and portability
K. K. Subramaniam
subbukk at gmail.com
Wed Dec 30 04:11:44 UTC 2009
Hi,
The methods named squeakToUTF8 appears regressive in the light of forks and
variants of Squeak and Smalltalk.
Is there any specific reason against calling it asUTF8" and so on? The methods
are not widely used yet to deserve leaving them in the image with a deprecated
flag.
Is there any idiomatic way to bulk rename a method (implementation and
senders) in an image? Doing a search and replace is tediously slow.
TIA .. Subbu
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|