[squeak-dev] Re: NanoTraits are go
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Dec 30 12:57:11 UTC 2009
Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Andreas Raab wrote:
>
>> After Classes Methods
>> Traits 27(*) 188
>> Kernel-Classes 10 589
>> Total 37(*) 777
>>
>> (*) includes 17 otherwise unused compatibility traits
>
> These 17 Traits seem to be empty (no methods). Is that intentional?
Yes, that's intentional. It appears that there may be external packages
that define extension methods on those traits. I've actually not found a
current example but there were some *foo categories in various images I
looked at and consequently it felt safer to keep them. I think we should
deprecate those traits over time.
Cheers,
- Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|