[squeak-dev] On the upcoming Leadership Election

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Sat Feb 14 22:52:15 UTC 2009


2009/2/14 Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com>:
> This is a perfect example of something I think the Leadership team
> should NOT have anything to do with.  The Leadership team should
> concentrate on those issues where a single decision has to be made or a
> job should only be done once.  For example joining the Software Freedom
> Conservancy can only be done once, there is no value in competition
> here.
>
> On the other hand technical issues can be investigated and solved by
> anyone and competition, if any, only improves the situation for
> everyone.  I'm certainly not opposed to the Leadership team smoothing
> the way somehow, but I currently see nothing it could do on this issue.
> I suppose it's conceivable that some day we might end up with two
> competing solutions and no easy way to decide.  In that case it might be
> appropriate for the Leadership team to step in and arbitrate.  But I
> find it extremely hard to believe that the community itself could not
> make a decision.
>
> Let me be clear, if this is the sort of thing you expect the Leadership
> team to focus on, do not vote for me.  Outside of the Leadership team I
> would contribute to a solution to this problem as I could and cheer
> right along with everyone else, but just as another developer and
> community member, not as a Leadership team member.
>
> Ken
>

Ken, i will make a separate list of technical-related questions.
Squeak is not only an idea, a philosophy, but a software environment
which stays behind ideas and works.
We weren't been here if this wasn't true.

-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list