On 2/26/09 6:08 PM, "Stéphane Rollandin" <lecteur at zogotounga.net> wrote:

> yes, sorry if my question sounded offensive. only it seems to me that
> there is quite a shift of focus from some members of this list from
> Squeak to Pharo, and it is not clear to me what is the dominant mindset
> there. the idea that worthy people might consider Squeak as a dead-end
> is a bit unsettling for me. I just wanted to have some feedback about it.
> 
> Stef


Stef:

Squeak is not a dead end and never could be as people care.

Keep tuned, Squeak 4.0 and 5.0 is on development now and I beg give a try to
SqueakLightII http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6056, the most modular and wide
range of different projects common ground TODAY.

Edgar