2009/7/2 Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org>:
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/2 Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org>:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ian,
>>>
>>> Ian Trudel wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Igor said, I think, that eToys can be a package on top of Squeak. It
>>>> should be perfectly fine for everybody.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> This means that in order for your vision to become a reality, you need to
>>> work on it or pay somebody to work on it. For instance, Cuis exists
>>> because
>>> I wanted such a system, so I built it. If it is useful for others, great.
>>> If
>>> not, at least I did get what I wanted in the first place.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No No No. Don't let us start over again!
>> By reading this message, it sounds literally:
>> - you don't like Squeak? Do like me: Fix things what you don't like
>> ..... in own fork.
>>
>>
>
> Not at all. It means literally:
> - It would be great to have Etoys as a package on top of Squeak (as Ian
> says). (That's exactly what I tried to do when I was the Morphic Team leader
> 4 or 5 years ago, btw.) However, saying that and not being able to get it
> done is useless.
>

Okay. So lets focus on things which can be done then.

Because after reading this topic, and especially last messages, i got
an impression that i can answer simply to the main question of Squeak:

Q: What is Squeak?
A: Anything you like it to be.
(next should be written with very small letters)
But only after you spend half of your life making it.


Sorry for sarcasm.

-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.