Guys, i can only welcome to see more such discussions, where you
trying to sort things out & between different points of view find
something on which you can both agree and move forward. Because its
really frustrating for me to see nothing else than grumbling and
unwilingness to cooperate.

2009/7/6 Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>:
>
>
>
> On 7/6/09 9:23 AM, "Keith Hodges" <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Edgar made SqueakLightII over a year ago (?) and we havent even been
>> able to harvest that work into a useful form yet.
>
> I should take the same road wiser Squeaker take before.
> I also feels "kicked in the ass without any good reasons" where I was the
> facto fired from Release Team.
> Now I wish going into main stream (if I could agree on something like going
> smaller an modular and have ProcustesEnd for code + picts + sound + morph +
> etc into packages)
> That means a new PackageInfo and a modified Monticello.
>
> When Ralph pick me I said he could be good have a "Monticello summit" and
> anyway we should use .cs
> We end 3.10 with .cs and many who said was wise decision don't raise his
> voice now.
>
> Maybe you could modify Bob for writing in the updates folder ?
> First "fake .cs" as we have in 3.10 should be some similar to
>
> 7068AdvanceToThreeDotTenAlpha.cs
>
> Then  some similar
>
> 7069ConvertTo3dot10.cs
>
> And then you could go as wild you wish and Mighty Board bless, use .mcz, .cs
> , DS, MC2 , sar , .pr, .morph , .sqz (I hope no miss some kind of code
> extension which could be feeded into Squeak)
>
> All could hit our squeak updates button and see how our number rise, our
> ..image go where no Squeaker go before...
>
> At this point some Java - Windoze comes and tell you he knows more but his
> time is too precious too bother change the color of screen he don't like.
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.