On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 18:17 +0100, Keith Hodges wrote:
> Ken Causey wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 03:14 +0100, Keith Hodges wrote:
> >   
> >> I propose that Ken organise the Mantis crew (you know who you are) to
> >> pick the top 100/200 or 300 bugs, and to test them in latest
> >> "3.10.2-build" available from 
> >>
> >> http://ftp.squeak.org/3.11/Squeak3.10.2-build/090628-1523/ 
> >>
> >> Mark those tests you are most confident in as "Resolved" - "fixed in
> >> 3.11", that is all you need to do to harvest a fix.
> >>     
> >
> > I'm a little bit confused here.  Shouldn't we mark the issues as 'test
> > for 3.11' so that Bob gets it's pass on the issues before they are in
> > fact considered good for harvesting?
> Hi Ken,
> 
> I figured that in the absence of Bob running the tests automatically, if
> you tested them manually that would be good enough to mark them as
> "resolved" for an alpha release.
> >   Perhaps I'm missing the point but
> > I'm assuming this is you making clear and wishing to 'practice' one
> > phase of the 3.11 plan which involves a little human pre-checking of
> > issues before Bob is let loose on them.  Is that correct?
> >   
> Just about, I simply don't have the spare time to set bob up right now.
> I might get to it in a week or so.
> 
> thanks again
> 
> Keith

OK, I'm going to have to think about this a bit before committing myself
to it.

Ken 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090707/4f1f9ce4/attachment.pgp