[squeak-dev] Re: Usability and look-and-feel (was Re: The future ofSqueak & Pharo (was Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT licenseclean))

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Thu Jul 9 11:30:11 UTC 2009


2009/7/9 David Corking <lists at dcorking.com>:
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>>>> I tried OB on
>>>> Pharo when I was looking into some FFI troubles. The main noticable
>>>> difference was *incredible* sluggishness. Every single action was greeted
>>>> with a 2-5 seconds pause. I kid you not.
> ...
>> I've seen a discussion , related to this in Pharo list and related to
>> improving the speed.
>
> Igor, I saw your February post, so I see the low-hanging fruit has
> been harvested:
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-February/005188.html
>
Ah, no :) I meant a more recent discussion, maybe a week ago or so.

> However the June pharo-dev image is slow to draw new OB windows.  (I
> didn't try more recent updates)  Is OmniBrowser in Squeak equally as
> slow?
>
I never tried to install it myself, so can't tell anything about it.

> As an alternative: tips to avoid frequently opening new windows may be useful.
>
I don't have a recipe :)
It depends on complexity/project code widespread & your current intents.
Currently i writing some stuff which is very small addition to
existing code base, so its enough to keep 2 browser windows open for
almost all my needs.
But sometimes it happens, that you need to go and explore things
(senders/implementors etc) and very soon you could have dozens of
windows open.



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list