[squeak-dev] Compiling Smalltalk
David Zmick
dz0004455 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 11 02:17:27 UTC 2009
Oh, I was not aware of that! Thank you!
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Joshua Gargus <schwa at fastmail.us> wrote:
> David Zmick wrote:
>
> Me and a cousin of mine where discussing the speed of compiled languages vs
> the speed of interpreted languages and the subject of compiling interpreted
> languages came up. Languages like Java that are compiled down to bytecode
> can then be compiled to machine code, but I was under the impression that
> concept was impossible with smalltalk. Why is this?
>
>
> I have no idea why you're under that impression; it's perfectly possible to
> compile Smalltalk to machine code. :-)
>
> There are many existence proofs, such as VisualWorks, Exupery, and Cog.
>
> (BTW, the jargon is Just In Time compilation, or JITting).
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
>
> And, I know there is a project to build a compiler for smaltalk, what is
> the concept behind it?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> David Zmick
> /dz0004455\
> http://david-zmick.co.cc
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
David Zmick
/dz0004455\
http://david-zmick.co.cc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090710/90283ed3/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|