Hi David,

Thanks for the cleanup.

Am 12.07.2009 um 01:00 schrieb David T. Lewis:
> In the case of line feed removal, the tricky thing was to convince
> Monticello to see the methods as "changed" to make the fix stay fixed.
> I did this manually with a vi editor (sorry, it's crude but it  
> worked).
I wonder why? Does Monticello not compare the method source but the  
compiled method?

> The class comments were worse. I resorted to saving the updates with
> an extra (bogus) class variable to make it look like the classes had
> changed, followed by another update to get rid of the bogus class
> variables.

Does someone know if this is fixed in Monticello 1.6? I was looking  
for overview about what bugs were fixed but did not find anything on  
the Swiki.

Cheers,
Bernhard