On 17.07.2009, at 19:29, Ian Trudel wrote:

> 2009/7/17 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>> He, maybe we need to invent methods to punish developers who break  
>> the trunk
>> in such a way ;)
>
> Or maybe not. In a continuous integration process, edgar could have
> been notified by email that his changes broke the trunk. A carbon copy
> can also be sent to the repository admit.

... and a Bad Developer Of The Week Award on the Squeak home page ;)

Just kidding.

>> In any case a process where development slows down when nearing a  
>> release
>> would be in order, we might need feature freezes etc. Maybe we  
>> simply set a
>> release date now and then work towards it?
>
> That would make sense. The trunk should be frozen at some point in the
> perspective of a release and then enter in a release phase. And the
> release phase can be something along 3.11 proposal. My idea of both
> development process is that they are not mutually exclusive.
>
> Are we going to have continuous integration on the trunk? Publishing
> results on a web page or something would be great.


Yes, that would be awesome to have.

- Bert -