[squeak-dev] Re: Smalltalk vs SmalltalkImage current woes
Eliot Miranda
eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 21:29:00 UTC 2009
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> I am currently using the Cuis, which doesn't having a 'SmalltalkImage
>> current' refactoring..
>>
>
> Ah, one of my favorite rant subjects. First, it's not a refactoring;
> refactorings leave the public interfaces intact (I really hate it when
> people call random rewrites "refactoring" code). Secondly I'm still 100%
> behind what I wrote here about Smalltalk vs. "SamlltalkImage current":
>
>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2007-June/118175.html
>
> I'm very glad to hear that Cuis doesn't use SmalltalkImage.
+10.
Now, Smalltalk == SmalltalkImage current and everyone is happy:
>> - dictionary lives in separate ivar,
>> - fat & boring housekeeping stuff lives in SmalltalkImage instance.
>>
>> What you think?
>>
>
> I think it's a definitive improvement to the current situation.
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090724/ec77c363/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|