Hi Tim,

thanks for your comment!

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Tim Olson<tim_olson at att.net> wrote:
> I suggest modifying the test to take this into account (only test for
> all-ones exponent and non-zero fraction), or remove that particular test.

I'd rather not remove a test just because it fails, even though the
test may be wrong, as in this case. Tests are good. :-)

I think I'll rewrite the test to accept any NaN value - quiet or
signalled. It's going to boil down to some substring comparisons...

Best,

Michael