[squeak-dev] The future of Squeak & Pharo (was Re: [Pharo-project]
[ANN] Pharo MIT license clean)
Juan Vuletich
juan at jvuletich.org
Sun Jun 28 18:46:56 UTC 2009
Keith Hodges wrote:
>> Squeak doesn't have a set of objectives and an agenda that is
>> meaningful for developers.
>>
> Yes it does.
>
> Keit
Ok. So, what does that set of objectives and agenda say about:
- Backwards compatiblity
- Removal (or not) of stuff
- Addition (or not) of stuff
- Modularity
- Any concrete statement (about the software, not the process!) so
people can know what to expect
?
When was it approved by the community or the elected leadership?
Was there a decision process involving the community?
Where can I read it?
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|