[squeak-dev] The future of Squeak & Pharo (was Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT license clean)

Juan Vuletich juan at jvuletich.org
Sun Jun 28 18:46:56 UTC 2009


Keith Hodges wrote:
>> Squeak doesn't have a set of objectives and an agenda that is
>> meaningful for developers. 
>>     
> Yes it does.
>
> Keit

Ok. So, what does that set of objectives and agenda say about:
- Backwards compatiblity
- Removal (or not) of stuff
- Addition (or not) of stuff
- Modularity
- Any concrete statement (about the software, not the process!) so 
people can know what to expect
?

When was it approved by the community or the elected leadership?

Was there a decision process involving the community?

Where can I read it?

Cheers,
Juan Vuletich



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list