[squeak-dev] The future of Squeak & Pharo (was Re: [Pharo-project]
[ANN] Pharo MIT license clean)
Stéphane Rollandin
lecteur at zogotounga.net
Mon Jun 29 06:30:36 UTC 2009
>>> - Not backward compatible
>
> because, unfortunately, it is a main obstacle for moving forward.
> Or maybe not? Maybe we should start making amazing stuff right now?
I am doing amazing stuff with Squeak right now. I have been doing so for
years.
Now that Pharo provides the non-backward compatible way, which is fine,
I don't understand why the question arises for Squeak once again. Pharo
is the solution, isn't it ? (and I mean it).
Stef
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|