[squeak-dev] The future of Squeak & Pharo

Markus Gaelli gaelli at emergent.de
Mon Jun 29 07:00:16 UTC 2009

Am 28.06.2009 um 21:07 schrieb Bert Freudenberg:

> On 28.06.2009, at 20:53, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Putney <cputney at wiresong.ca> writes:
>> Colin> IMHO, Squeak.org needs to either recommit to Etoys and  
>> education as its
>> Colin> primary mission, or break compatibility and become a general  
>> Smalltalk
>> Colin> platform for a variety of applications. This suggests a  
>> merger with
>> Colin> either Squeakland or Pharo, but even without merging,  
>> Squeak.org can
>> Colin> get its mojo back if it chooses an identity.
>> At this point, I'd be leaning back towards squeak central  
>> reintegrating Pharo,
>> given that Etoys already forked.
> Even disregarding what the Pharo people would think about the idea,  
> doesn't that argument go both ways? As in "given that Pharo already  
> forked, Etoys can now be reintegrated to Squeak"?


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list