On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 16:42 -0400, Ian Trudel wrote:
> Thank you, Ken. It's never too much to be reassured of Squeak
> Oversight Board's devotion to its community. Hopefully, the board can
> give us a sense of direction and help the community to move forward.
> 
> Would it be possible to update the agenda on the blog, according to
> these discussions? Naturally, if it's possible for you guys to talk
> about these issues during the upcoming meeting... =)

It's not only possible, you don't even need me to do it.  Simply add a
comment to that blog entry.  Frankly I'm still digesting the recent
discussions and unsure what to take away from it.  An agenda item
written by someone other than me is likely to make more sense.

Ken

> Best regards,
> Ian
> 
> 2009/6/29 Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com>:
> > I've been asked to clarify that the Squeak Oversight Board is paying
> > attention to the current discussions.  I had thought that would be
> > obvious since several of the Board members have been participating to
> > one extent or another (Igor, Andreas, Bert, and Randal for example).
> > But it has been pointed out that not everyone is aware of the current
> > board members.
> >
> > If you haven't already you might want to read our last meeting report
> > and our upcoming agenda notes for Wednesday:
> >
> > http://squeakboard.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/meeting-report-for-6172009/
> >
> > http://squeakboard.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/meeting-agenda-for-712009/
> >
> > Feel free to propose agenda items.
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090629/10c9d984/attachment.pgp