http://n2.nabble.com/Preference-refactoring-again-tt2403814.html

2009/3/5 Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de>:
> Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>>
>> I trust you and your implementation should go to current .image ASAP.
>> If at some point some guy of different secta come with a better code, we
>> don
>> reject for "heretic" =:)
>
> To the contrary. Let's give collaboration a chance. It would be stupid if we
> ended up with just enough difference to make us incompatible at such a
> superficial level. At the very least we should be waiting for a week or two
> to see if there's any reaction from the Pharo folks. Even if there is no
> reaction we should try to make it compatible at the interface (pragma)
> level. I'd be willing to do at least that but I'd need to know what their
> pragma spec actually looks like (can anyone subscribed to Pharo post an
> example or point me to ti?)
>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.