[squeak-dev] keeping arrow for assignment operator
Joshua Gargus
schwa at fastmail.us
Thu Mar 12 17:08:11 UTC 2009
Juan Vuletich wrote:
>
>
> There's not a real consensus in this area. Many people (me included)
> really prefer the left arrow for assignment and will not accept others
> to prevent us from doing so. Please don't promise that. Switch to :=
> only if you want.
I usually agree with what you write, but this is simply wrong. There is
not *unanimous* consensus that left-arrow should be deprecated, but when
has there ever been, in the Squeak community? However, there is
certainly a consensus. You're free to use an old/modified Squeak that
support underscore-assignment-rendered-as-an-arrow, but the community
has clearly decided otherwise (please don't make me dig for references,
but I will if I have to).
You shouldn't muddy the waters for Squeak newcomers who haven't
experienced the history first-hand. Underscore assignment is on the way
out. Period.
I like the look of the left-arrow myself, but there's no reason that a
pretty-printer can't render it that way; unfortunately nobody has
stepped up to make that a reality. On the other hand, I look forward to
when underscore-assignment is not only deprecated, but completely
disallowed, so that I can, for example, program OpenGL in Squeak using
identical constant names (eg: GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT instead of
GLColorBufferBit).
Cheers,
Josh
>
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|