[squeak-dev] Re: Problem with supperclasses in Sunit

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Thu Mar 26 15:50:19 UTC 2009


Keith Hodges wrote:
> I wrote SUnit-improved because if we dont move it forward we have

I've got no problems with your enhancements. I was trying to caution 
Mariano to apply a level of judgement before loading random bits off the 
net.

But since you seem to know the code, how about you help him fix his 
problem? My motto is: If you break it, you fix it :-)

Cheers,
   - Andreas

> a) no way to categorise tests to indicate what should work where.
> b) we have no way to time or know if tests use the network
> c) we have no way to integrate other testing frameworks ie. SSpec into
> the existing GUI etc etc.
> d) you cant define an exception handler around your tests to collect
> notifications.
> 
> etc etc.
> 
> All that has changed in this instance is that #shouldInheritSelectors
> must be defined explicitly for your class, which is better I think, it
> doesn't depend upon who my superclass happens to be. I can remember
> having issues with this going back 10 years.
> 
> As far as I know this is the only change to the existing api.
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list