[squeak-dev] Re: Problem with supperclasses in Sunit
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Thu Mar 26 15:50:19 UTC 2009
Keith Hodges wrote:
> I wrote SUnit-improved because if we dont move it forward we have
I've got no problems with your enhancements. I was trying to caution
Mariano to apply a level of judgement before loading random bits off the
net.
But since you seem to know the code, how about you help him fix his
problem? My motto is: If you break it, you fix it :-)
Cheers,
- Andreas
> a) no way to categorise tests to indicate what should work where.
> b) we have no way to time or know if tests use the network
> c) we have no way to integrate other testing frameworks ie. SSpec into
> the existing GUI etc etc.
> d) you cant define an exception handler around your tests to collect
> notifications.
>
> etc etc.
>
> All that has changed in this instance is that #shouldInheritSelectors
> must be defined explicitly for your class, which is better I think, it
> doesn't depend upon who my superclass happens to be. I can remember
> having issues with this going back 10 years.
>
> As far as I know this is the only change to the existing api.
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|