[squeak-dev] Re: category support fixes for MC1.5?
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Thu Mar 26 21:45:03 UTC 2009
Igor Stasenko wrote:
> as a side note, are category order are that important?
Yes.
> To me, its a browser who should care to show them in alphabetical
> order to ease finding a needed caterory , when they number are big
> (like in Object)
There is logical order (initialize comes first, then accessing, private
goes last) that I usually stick to. But more importantly there is
internal consistency. To me it makes a big difference to see, e.g.,
events
accessing
private
filters
initialize
queries
vs.
initialize
accessing
events
filters
queries
private
(this is an example taken straight out of code that I'm looking at this
very moment with MC having messed it up into the first form where I
wrote it in the second form). At the very least MC should respect the
intention of people who care.
Cheers,
- Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|