Yes, good point. I've put it on the agenda for the board meeting:

http://squeakboard.wordpress.com/2009/04/22/initial-agenda-for-may-7th-2009/

Cheers,
   - Andreas

John M McIntosh wrote:
> I note if you go to the squeak.org website and tap but report it dumps 
> you into Mantis. However for novices that likely isn't helpful
> and the link to a mail message from Feb isn't something anyone is going 
> to find, or mmm or remember.
> 
> On 5-May-09, at 9:05 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> 
>> I'll check it out. Also note that cc-ing 
>> release at lists.squeakfoundation.org will generally be useful.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>  - Andreas
>>
>> John M McIntosh wrote:
>>> Well then for http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6581
>>> who would stick that into 3.11? Let alone that I'm looking at 3.10.2 
>>> image
>>> Added (partly)
>>> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7348
>>> On 5-May-09, at 2:07 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>>> Hi John -
>>>>
>>>> John M McIntosh wrote:
>>>>> (I had to fix the sq 3.10.2 image because of ignored bug using 
>>>>> allInstances I reported years back, never fixed, but fixed in pharo 
>>>>> last fall).
>>>>
>>>> [... snip ...]
>>>>
>>>>> (to be fair here I could bring some fixes into the 3.10.2 image to 
>>>>> reduce the cpu time, but really those fixes should have gone in 
>>>>> years ago...)
>>>>
>>>> Just as an FYI, there is now a well-defined process for contributing 
>>>> stuff to 3.11:
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-February/134095.html 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If these fixes are on Mantis all you need is to provide an installer 
>>>> script and update its status accordingly. Just try it!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> - Andreas
> 
> -- 
> ===========================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>   Twitter:  
> squeaker68882
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> ===========================================================================
> 
> 
> 
>