[squeak-dev] Re: printing collections

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Mon Nov 2 23:37:44 UTC 2009


Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> While at isSelfEvaluating, I wonder why we do not abuse {..} notation
> a bit more.
> Instead of printing 'aSet( 0 at 0 1 at 2 )'
> we could just make it evaluate proof '{0 at 0. 1 at 2} asSet'
> 
> Of course, with limited stream, we take the risk of loosing trailing '
> asSet' information.
> So we can also print using a less nice but still evaluating 'Set
> newFrom: {0 at 0. 1 at 2}'.
> 
> As a bonus, generalizing this behaviour might also eliminate a few
> bytecodes and methods from the Kernel.
> 
> Same for storeOn:
> 
> What do you think ?

-1. The goal of printing isn't to make parsing easier. In fact I find 
this to be the least useful application of {} - the advantage of the 
syntax form is that it is immediately recognized and consequently 
requires less effort than having "an Array(". That you can also evaluate 
it in some situations is a useful side effect but no more.

Cheers,
   - Andreas



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list