[squeak-dev] Waiting forever on squeaksource (citezen)

Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez miguel.coba at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 20:11:28 UTC 2009


El mar, 10-11-2009 a las 12:02 -0800, Ross Boylan escribió:
> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 10:52 -0800, RossBoylan at stanfordalumni.org wrote:
> > I tried to install Citezen-All-onierstrasz.18 from
> > 'http://www.squeaksource.com/Citezen' but after I hit load the hourglass
> > just sits there (waited several minutes).  I've pulled other packages
> > successfully from squeaksource, as recently as yesterday.
> For the record, the problem is cleared up now.  I assume the cause was
> the hang-up of squeaksource reported by Nicolas.
> 
> I prefer to use squeak because getting magma going under pharo has its
> own set of challenges--I'm not even sure I ever got it to work.  

Umm, I haven't had any problem and I am using it daily on production.
What problem do you have to got it work on Pharo?

> magma
> only recently added pharo support, so things are probably more likely to
> go wrong there.  

That is a subjective opinion. As said before I haven't had any problem
with magma on pharo.


> Finally, I'm not crazy about forks and want to help the
> mainline stay healthy.

I prefer to use PharoCore for deployment and not worry about trimming a
squeak image when loading several images on production. The squeak
stable image is to big, and you must update it and then trimming it.
That is not the case with PharoCore. In it I just load the packages I
want and nothing else. Perfect for deployment.

Cheers
PS. to the "against-recommending-pharo" souls, this is not a pharo
advertisement, just I think that Magma is as stable and solid on Pharo
as is on Squeak, no matter its short life.


> 
> Ross
> 
> 
-- 
Miguel Cobá
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list