El mar, 10-11-2009 a las 12:22 -0800, Andreas Raab escribió:
> Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote:
> > I prefer to use PharoCore for deployment and not worry about trimming a
> > squeak image when loading several images on production. The squeak
> > stable image is to big, and you must update it and then trimming it.
> 
> Out of curiosity, what have you been trimming in the past for your 
> production deployments?

I don't remember exactly but they included sound related ones like
nebraska, tests, squeak map, sunit, a lot of morphic extras and complete
categories that my code didn't use. A lot of trial and test in order to
not break anything.

> 
> > PS. to the "against-recommending-pharo" souls, this is not a pharo
> > advertisement, just I think that Magma is as stable and solid on Pharo
> > as is on Squeak, no matter its short life.
> 
> I think it may be helpful to phrase your comments a bit more carefully. 
> Keep in mind that the split between Pharo and Squeak has left just as 
> many people wounded here as it has in the Pharo world. There is no need 
> to rub it in every time you post here. A bit caution is useful since you 
> don't know the history and the individuals involved.

Fair enough.

> 
> Cheers,
>    - Andreas
> 
-- 
Miguel Cobá
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx