2009/11/10 Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de>:
> Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote:
>>
>> I prefer to use PharoCore for deployment and not worry about trimming a
>> squeak image when loading several images on production. The squeak
>> stable image is to big, and you must update it and then trimming it.
>
> Out of curiosity, what have you been trimming in the past for your
> production deployments?
>
>> PS. to the "against-recommending-pharo" souls, this is not a pharo
>> advertisement, just I think that Magma is as stable and solid on Pharo
>> as is on Squeak, no matter its short life.
>
> I think it may be helpful to phrase your comments a bit more carefully. Keep
> in mind that the split between Pharo and Squeak has left just as many people
> wounded here as it has in the Pharo world. There is no need to rub it in
> every time you post here. A bit caution is useful since you don't know the
> history and the individuals involved.
>

+1

i want to see a success for both Squeak and Pharo (!!SERIOUSLY!!). I
don't see much barriers why they could not coexist peacefully and
exchange the ideas. But if we start agitating people, like Miguel
does, there are less chances to have a peaceful coexistance, and maybe
Miguel don't realizing that he does more damage to Pharo by agitating
people to switch on it, than
any potential benefit, because there always other people who
potentially would consider to contribute to Pharo, but don't like the
attitude how people like Miguel treating Squeak.

People choosing the platform to work with for own reasons, lets just
respect their choice.


> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.