Am 12.11.2009 um 17:11 schrieb Colin Putney:
> On 12-Nov-09, at 4:30 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Resurrecting the topic.
>> Guys, is there anyone else has to say something about it?
>> 
>> Or we should consider that discussion is closed?
>> Given the often opposite opinions, i think it would be really hard to
>> distill & build some formal statements on top of that..
>> Or maybe i'm wrong, and we got a consensus here?
> 
> I don't have much to add to the discussion, but if you, as a board member, want feedback from the community, perhaps my two bits are relevant. :-)
> 
> I'm happy with the new development model. I find it much easier to contribute to the trunk than to the new process that the release team was developing. I know that Keith has explained how the process worked numerous times, on this list and elsewhere, but I could never understand it. The trunk process is easy to understand, easy to participate in and easy to observe.
> 
> As for the issue of governance, I have no problem with the way this decision was made and carried out. Sure, the board could have been more diplomatic. At the end of the day, though, they were rejecting somebody's work, and I doubt that any amount of diplomacy could have made that go over well. I don't see any need to impose additional rules or restrictions on what the board can do. The existing system of governance works fine.
> 
> Finally, a hat tip to Andreas, for his leadership in the trunk process. He's been in there reviewing inbox submissions, provoking discussion and channelling people's enthusiasm into real progress. Without him, the trunk would have gone nowhere. Well done.
> 
> Colin
May I go the easy way and just say ... +10!
;-)

Thanks Andreas and Board!

Cheers,
Bernhard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20091112/b98d6a26/attachment.htm