2009/9/2 Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg at gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Keith Hodges <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>>
>> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> >
>> > On 02.09.2009, at 09:33, Damien Cassou wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Michael van der
>> >> Gulik<mikevdg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Would it perhaps be better to have the automated trunk commit
>> >>> messages going
>> >>> to some other dedicated mailing list?
>> Which we already have.
>> >> With squeaksource, it is easy to get an RSS feed of a package. That
>> >> way only people interested get noticed.
>> >
>> >
>> > Why would people on squeak-dev not be interested in Squeak development?
>> 1. Not having time.
>>
>> 2. Poluting the exisiting actual human messages with extra stuff to
>> trawl through when you are searching for something.
>
>
> 95% of the human messages end up in my trash unread. I'm finding about the
> same proportion of commit messages are relevant to me as human messages.
>
> I'm becoming a bit of a fan of the commit messages. You can see what's
> happening, and it's the best forum for discussing changes.
>
indeed :)
sometimes i like to turn on my "exploration mode" to see what's new
and what is happening around
and reading commits is quite interesting way to stay in touch with
latest & hottest stuff.

> Gulik.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
>
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.