On 10.09.2009, at 20:55, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> On 9/10/09 12:32 PM, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what you mean. Yes I see these files in the repository but
>> AFAICT they are not used.
> Ok, and thanks to Phillipe also.
> What I mean is the files can't be loaded because NOT in this  
> repository.

Ah, maybe the files are missing then and only the meta data preserved.

>> Did you see Andreas' mail? He succeeded to load it into a trunk  
>> image.
>> I was just too busy to follow up on that yet.
>
> No, I afraid I miss Andreas  mail.




Begin forwarded message:

> From: Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de>
> Date: 6. September 2009 20:53:43 MESZ
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> >
> Cc: Lukas Renggli <renggli at iam.unibe.ch>
> Subject: [squeak-dev] Re: source.squeak.org down again
> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> >
>
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> I just added you as developer on source.squeak.org.
>
> Thanks. If you take a fully updated trunk image, you can load SS  
> using the SSLoader configuration map on source.squeak.org. Once  
> loaded, you can launch SS via:
>
> SSRepository classPool at: #Current
> 	put: SSRepository defaultRepository.
> SSRepository classPool at: #Storage
> 	put: SSRepository defaultStorage.
> SSRepository current rootUrl: 'http://localhost:9090/'.
> SSRepository startUp.
>
> (btw, where are the mutators for Current/Storage?)
>
>> And the squeaksource.com repo is open to anybody.
>
> Thanks but I don't want to mess things up (i.e., break stuff in 3.7  
> etc) in case there are people still interested in it. I feel more  
> comfortable messing up things at source.squeak.org since we only  
> need to maintain the version that we're planning to run ;-)
>
>> Has anyone ever migrated a largish source repository to a new  
>> image? Anything to watch out for?
>
> Since we have so few projects we could just import all the files  
> again. We did this when we switched to Gemstone at work and it  
> worked all right.
>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>