[squeak-dev] Advice on new projects
Colin Putney
cputney at wiresong.ca
Thu Sep 17 20:55:15 UTC 2009
On 2009-09-17, at 11:24 AM, Ross Boylan <ross at biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote:
> I'm using Monticello, as distributed in the image, for managing the
> project. Is that a sensible choice?
Yes. Monticello 1 is quite stable, and in wide use. The documentation
is here:
> Should I use MC 2? Despite its age
> it seems to still be a bit unfinished, certainly with respect to
> documentation.
That's right. MC2 is still experimental. There is a tool for
converting repositories so you'll be able to move to MC2 when it
becomes more mainstream.
> I'm putting my classes in MC type class categories, and prefixing them
> with an indentifying code (MI for one, undecided for the other). This
> seems a weak substitute for namespaces, however.
Yes, that's a good way to do things.
Colin
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|