On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>wrote:

> On 25.09.2009, at 10:05, richard snow wrote:
>
>  On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Ian Piumarta <piumarta at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, richard snow wrote:
>>>
>>>  When I tried to compile his trunk version I get the error messages in
>>>> the attached file over and over again
>>>> and the make never seems to finish.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I just upgraded my autoconf/libtool and can now reproduce the broken
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ian. I've gone out of state on a short trip.  I've got a new
>> girlfriend.  We are talking
>> marriage.
>>
>
> Congrats!
>
>  I downloaded the ST80 Blue book.
>>
>> See ya
>>
>
> Great too! :)
>
> Anybody for reconsidering the reply-to munging on this list?
>

Please!  Its much easier to repost again to the right address than it is to
retract a private message ;)
But *why* can't mailers make more of a fuss about reply/reply-all?  This
kind of mistake is incredibly easy to make.


>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090925/cfed4a2f/attachment.htm