[squeak-dev] The Inbox: Kernel-ul.251.mcz

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 02:11:33 UTC 2009


On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>
>  On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM, <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Item was added:
>>> + ----- Method: BlockClosure>>timeToRunWithoutGC (in category
>>> 'evaluating')
>>>
>>
>> Could this method be put somewhere other than in Kernel, say for example
>> in
>> a separate profiling package?
>>
>>
> Since #timeToRun is in the Kernel package and it's a profiling method, it
> seemed obvious to use the same package and category for this method. Any
> reason why it should be in another package (if it will get into the trunk)?
>
>
My style would be to have the kernel only contain kernel stuff, and a
separate profiling package would contain profiling stuff including
>>timeToRun. Ordinary users don't need profiling tools. It's subjective
though; either way would work.

Gulik.

-- 
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090928/f914241d/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list