[squeak-dev] MessageNames: clicking on class names

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at angband.za.org
Thu Apr 1 08:18:44 UTC 2010


Can we make it so that the tools log in for us? Well, yes, I suppose it 
can by one updating one's repository string?

MCHttpRepository
	location: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/'
	user: 'myaccount'
	password: 'mypassword'

I'm happy to have a required login, and I'd like to avoid having to 
manually log in anywhere too.

frank

Casey Ransberger wrote:
> I'd rather we all had accounts too I think. Sometimes I'm not clear on 
> what came from who by initials alone. It's nice to see what different 
> people are working on.
> 
> +1
> 
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de 
> <mailto:bert at freudenbergs.de>> wrote:
> 
>     On 31.03.2010, at 23:45, Ken Causey wrote:
>      >
>      > On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 22:52 +0200, Frank Shearar wrote:
>      >> Hi,
>      >>
>      >> I'm not entirely sure how to contribute to the inbox. Well, I know
>      >> enough to commit a change to the inbox :) I mean the social process
>      >> aspect of things. So anyway, feel free to correct me on
>     etiquette and
>      >> protocol.
>      >
>      > I have nothing to correct really, but I thought I would comment
>     on the
>      > etiquette since you brought it up.  I may be overlooking
>     something but
>      > the only things I would suggest for inbox committers is:
>      >
>      > 1. Update completely to current trunk before submitting to the inbox.
>      > This ensure that your submission's ancestor will be the most recent
>      > version in the trunk and is about the best you can do to make it
>     easier
>      > on core developers to merge your changes.
>      >
>      > 2. Write a good comment.  Try to keep it terse but touch on the main
>      > points and if there is a Mantis issue, note the relevant issue
>      > number(s).
>      >
>      > 3. Another I've thought of which is purely optional but I think we
>      > should consider strongly suggesting is that you create an account at
>      > source.squeak.org <http://source.squeak.org> and login before
>     committing.  Certainly the repository
>      > is world-writable but submitting it with your account helps to ensure
>      > proper attribution and also gives us a point to ensure that
>     submitters
>      > have agreed to the MIT licensing.
>      >
>      > Truthfully I would advocate requiring signing in, but this would
>     require
>      > changes to SqueakSource to enforce I believe and may be considered an
>      > unnecessary hurdle.
>      >
>      > That's all I can think of at the moment anyway,
>      >
>      > Ken
> 
>     I've been thinking about your third point too. The change necessary
>     to the source server would not be too hard I think. But identifying
>     uploaders would be helpful IMHO. It's also good for bragging, since
>     only if you are logged in are commits counted for you :)
> 
>     Does anyone think it would be too much of a burden to create an account?
> 
>     - Bert -
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list