On 01.04.2010, at 16:21, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/1/10 10:02 AM, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> 
>> On 01.04.2010, at 12:48, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/1/10 6:17 AM, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, like this:
>>>> 
>>>> MCHttpRepository
>>>> location: 'http://source.squeak.org/inbox'
>>>> user: 'myinitials'
>>>> password: 'mypassword'
>>>> 
>>>> Once you do that it will remember the password and log you in automatically.
>>>> 
>>>> - Bert -
>>> 
>>> That means the squeak source image of trunk running the repositories let
>>> some guy log once he/ she change to his name / pass ?
>>> 
>>> Example:
>>> 
>>> Cassandra Lopez log as mynitials / mypassword
>>> Then she changes to cassandra matrix2010
>>> The image running the repositories save his name / pass
>>> Next time she logs as cassandra matrix2010
>>> 
>>> Or ?
>> 
>> She edits the repository info
>> 
>> ?
>> ?
>> ?
>> 
>> 
>> and enters her initials and password:
>> 
>> ?
>> ?
>> ?
>> 
>> 
>> then saves the image.
>> 
>> If Cassandra is worried about saving the password in the image, she can leave
>> it empty. Then MC will ask every time the password is needed.
>> 
>> If she finds all this too inconvenient, she can store her initials and
>> password in the external "prefs/mcSettings" file instead. Then she never has
>> to enter them manually, even after downloading a new image. The file format is
>> documented in the "userAndPasswordFromSettingsDo:" method:
>> 
>> ?
>> ?
>> ?
>> 
>> - Bert -
>> 
>> 
>> ?
> 
> Very clear but...
> 
> This is for the client image, the one any have in his/her machine
> 
> How about the server image, the giant one running and having thousands of
> packages, etc.
> 
> Viele danke 

I don't understand the question. What do you want to know about the server image?

It's just a regular trunk image that has the squeaksource package and its dependencies loaded. Those are publicly available at
http://source.squeak.org/ss.html

And I would not call a 30 MB image "giant".

- Bert -