[squeak-dev] Installing Seaside - 99.2% Green

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at angband.za.org
Mon Apr 5 11:59:10 UTC 2010


Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
> 
>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing much to report.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com. 
>>>>>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test Runner says:
>>>>>> 284 run, 282 passes
>>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>>>>>
>>>>> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should 
>>>>> open an issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing 
>>>>> (though OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>>>>>
>>>>> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the 
>>>>> Seaside developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that's entirely fair: they're more than happy to have 
>>>> Seaside run on Squeak. They're just not prepared to do our job for us.
>>>>
>>>>> So we can:
>>>>> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and 
>>>>> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
>>>>> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian 
>>>>> suggested) which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
>>>>
>>>> I vote for this one. Radoslav Hodnicak expressed an interest in 
>>>> (co)maintaining a Seaside-Squeak-Core. I suppose I'm tentatively 
>>>> putting up my hand here too?
>>>
>>> There's no point in splitting if Seaside-Squeak-Core and 
>>> Seaside-Pharo-Core will be the same in less than a month IMHO.
>>
>> I don't follow the Pharo list: do they plan to do what we did with 
>> regards to Dictionary and Set? (Could we persuade them to?)
> 
> Read this thread: 
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-March/023289.html

Ah, great!

If that test's a false negative, as it looks to be, then we should just 
wait.

frank



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list