[squeak-dev] Installing Seaside - 99.2% Green
Frank Shearar
frank.shearar at angband.za.org
Mon Apr 5 11:59:10 UTC 2010
Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>
>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing much to report.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com.
>>>>>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test Runner says:
>>>>>> 284 run, 282 passes
>>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>>>>>
>>>>> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should
>>>>> open an issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing
>>>>> (though OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>>>>>
>>>>> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the
>>>>> Seaside developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that's entirely fair: they're more than happy to have
>>>> Seaside run on Squeak. They're just not prepared to do our job for us.
>>>>
>>>>> So we can:
>>>>> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and
>>>>> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
>>>>> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian
>>>>> suggested) which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
>>>>
>>>> I vote for this one. Radoslav Hodnicak expressed an interest in
>>>> (co)maintaining a Seaside-Squeak-Core. I suppose I'm tentatively
>>>> putting up my hand here too?
>>>
>>> There's no point in splitting if Seaside-Squeak-Core and
>>> Seaside-Pharo-Core will be the same in less than a month IMHO.
>>
>> I don't follow the Pharo list: do they plan to do what we did with
>> regards to Dictionary and Set? (Could we persuade them to?)
>
> Read this thread:
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-March/023289.html
Ah, great!
If that test's a false negative, as it looks to be, then we should just
wait.
frank
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|