[squeak-dev] Release blues?

Casey Ransberger casey.obrien.r at gmail.com
Mon Apr 19 19:08:35 UTC 2010


"Art is never finished, only abandoned." -- DaVinci

There will always be more releases. While I didn't agree with everything
that went into 4.1, I am very happy to be able to so easily unload so many
things from it, and I think the future is very bright.

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>wrote:

> On 19.04.2010, at 14:56, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> >
> > On 4/19/10 9:43 AM, "Ian Trudel" <ian.trudel at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Edgar, it's just ground rules to make sure everybody gets his or her
> >> chance.
> >
> >
> > Don't read any you don't like.
> > I said any I like as a free man.
>
> Actually, Ian is trying to find out what exactly would make contributors
> more happy. It's awesome he's trying to moderate the discussion to a useful
> format.
>
> > Tired of try Squeak improves, best I do not waste my time with people who
> > take a Blue Pill with breakfast so they happy continue his dream of all
> is
> > perfect.
> >
> > Edgar
>
> Shipping a release is not saying "all is perfect". We're very aware of
> that. But if we waited until "all is perfect" we would *never* have a
> release.
>
> And since you are worried about backwards compatibility in particular: I
> just forwarded the notes from last week's Etoys developer chat. There we
> discussed an idea about how to load old projects into new Squeak versions.
> How does that sound?
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100419/daa127f7/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list