This is one of the things that made pulling current Polymorph stuff into
Squeak painful. If we shared a common ToolBuilder implementation, I would
image that other pain points might disappear too.

+1

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:32 AM, stephane ducasse <
stephane.ducasse at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes we are.
> Even if there was some discussions about the usefulness of toolbuilder spec
> - I would be in favor.
>
> Stef
>
> > On 4/21/2010 4:32 AM, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
> >> A question: Art the ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 and Pharo 1.0 the same?
> >> Or if there is a difference what is the impact of it?
> >>
> >> Or put the question in another way. If I code an UI using the
> >> ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 will it run in Pharo?
> >
> > They are mostly the same but not identical. If there is interest in the
> Pharo community we should merge the versions upstream in
> http://www.squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder.html (contact me if you're
> interested).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >  - Andreas
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100422/033c60a9/attachment.htm