On 2010/04/22 16:34, Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
>> Yes, MIT is compulsory for 4.1.
>
> Well, for inclusion only, so I don't think it matters for the Prolog
> package.
>
> (I'm currently co-maintainer of Prolog, but since I did not write all of
> it I can't change the licence anyway)

Indeed, I meant only to address the association of SqueakL with 
image-inclusion, not to imply that the Prolog package should be MIT.

frank