On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:08:06AM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 30.04.2010, at 04:33, David T. Lewis wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:13:30PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >> 
> >> Also, we could add more VMs if people provide them, though these three
> >> should go a long way.
> >> Not sure what to do about 64 bit Linux, maybe just tweak the script to
> >> run the 32 bit version anyway?
> > 
> > IMO tweaking the script to run the 32-bit VM is the best thing to do
> > right now. It gives more consistency in the plugins (some are still
> > not available in 64-bit form), and the only real downside is the need
> > to install 32-bit runtime libraries. I expect that it is easier to
> > explain to new users that they need to install 32-bit libraries from
> > their Linux distro than it is to explain way some Squeak capabilities
> > do not work if they happen to be using a 64-bit OS.
> 
> Sounds good. What is the output of this on your 64 bit machine?
> 
> 	echo `uname -s`-`uname -m`

$ echo `uname -s`-`uname -m`
Linux-x86_64

> 
> ... or send me a patched Squeak.sh :)

Here is an etoys.sh that works for me.

Dave

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: etoys.sh
Type: application/x-sh
Size: 2623 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100430/914414e3/etoys.sh