[squeak-dev] Re: problem with filein

Bert Freudenberg bert at freudenbergs.de
Thu Aug 12 19:20:15 UTC 2010


On 12.08.2010, at 20:48, Andreas Raab wrote:

> On 8/12/2010 10:44 AM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote:
>> So the file in had actually worked just fine, but at this point deleted
>> all the instance methods that had just been created. This might cause
>> problems for others, but I didn't call it a "bug" since each part is
>> correct in itself. Perhaps there should be a warning for 1? I imagine
>> that would be annoying and even scary when loading stuff out of order.
> 
> What do you think about implementing ProtoObject class>>initialize as an empty stub? This would act as a backstop for situations like these.

It should not be empty but an error message "Never send initialize to super on the class side!"

- Bert -




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list