>>>>> "Jecel" == Jecel Assumpcao <jecel at merlintec.com> writes:

Jecel> 1) the class was defined as a subclass of something that was not in the
Jecel> image, so the system was silently making it a subclass of ProtoObject
Jecel> instead (though the browser said it was a subclass of Object - very
Jecel> odd). Didn't we have a warning for this situation?

I can't imagine any case where

  Foo subclass: #Bar [...]

should *succeed* if Foo doesn't exist.  Can you explain why this isn't fatal?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion