On 8/23/2010 3:49 AM, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
> Dear all
>
> What I have understood so far:
>
> You are talking about learning from the experience of Juan (and
> hopefully Pavel as he seems to be back and willing to donate time) to
> reapply those changes to the regular Squeak 4.1 trunk.
>
> Is this correct?

Yes, that is the idea.

Cheers,
   - Andreas

>
> --Hannes
>
> On 8/22/10, Chris Muller<asqueaker at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Casey Ransberger
>> <casey.obrien.r at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> To be clear: I am not arguing against rebasing the trunk on Cuis. I'm just
>>> not clear on what we gain by doing so, rather than by continuing to make
>>> packages unloadable, and by settling on a mechanism to reload them on
>>> demand, while keeping reasonable safeguards in place to make sure they'll
>>> work with a particular release.
>>
>> Morphic 3?
>>
>>> My biggest concern is: has Cuis seen the same scrutiny that went into
>>> Squeak 4.0 with regard to licensing concerns? Have we run this idea past
>>> the SFC?
>>
>> Ah, good point.  I hope Juan will comment about this.
>>
>>   - Chris
>>
>>
>
>