Don't feed this troll.

   - A.

On 8/24/2010 4:55 PM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez wrote:
> El mié, 25-08-2010 a las 01:09 +0200, Levente Uzonyi escribió:
>
>> Sorry, but I totally don't get what you're talking about. IMHO Pharo's
>> Kernel/Collections/Network/Compiler is (far) behind Squeak's. I think
>> Pharo lacks developers who have enough knowledge to touch those parts of
>> the system and are willing to spend their time on it. But I may be wrong,
>> so please let me know how is PharoKernel/Core better than Squeak.
>
>
> IMHO Squeak's
> Business penetration/Comercial apps/Look&Feel/Website/Logo/new blood/ is
> (far) behind Pharo's.
>
>>> full-timers now. And original goals of Squeak are very different from
>>
>> Hiring more people doesn't mean it will be better.
>
> This sound like only a few genius are capable of touching those parts,
> very humble indeed.
>
> Now, shoot all you have! :)
>